HOME  |  CONTACT  |  PLANNING PARTNERSHIP  |  REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

 
                     
ABOUT

VISION AND INITIATIVES

POLICY PLAN

2030 CONCEPT PLANS

IMPLEMENTATION CAMPAIGNS

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT

SCHEDULE AND PROGRESS


REPORTS AND PUBLICATIONS

NEWSROOM

 

 
 

Policy Plan
For Intergovernmental Collaboration
PUBLIC DISCUSSION DRAFT
BASED ON OKI LAND USE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS, NOVEMBER 2004

Introduction  |  Transportation  |  Public Facilities and Services
Natural Systems  |  Housing  |  Economic Development 
Land Use  |  Footnotes

 

LAND USE

Policy Opportunity:
23. Up-to-date, consistent, and coordinated comprehensive plans that links land use, transportation, economic development, public facilities, housing, natural resources, recreation, intergovernmental coordination and capital budgeting can expedite progress toward the collective vision for Hamilton County’s future.

Implementation Policies:
23.1. Hamilton County and local government comprehensive plans should be consistent with the Hamilton County 2030 Plan and OKI’s model comprehensive plan guidelines, which link transportation, land use, economic development, public facilities, housing, natural resources, recreation, intergovernmental coordination and capital improvement29 programs and budgets.

23.2. Hamilton County and local government comprehensive plans should guide the adoption and amendment of Hamilton County and local government zoning regulations.

23.3. Hamilton County and local government comprehensive plans should balance the public interest and private property rights.

23.4. Hamilton County and local governments should assure that adopted comprehensive plans are current by scheduling an update and public review at least once every five years.

23.5. Hamilton County and local governments should work with their state legislators, professional associations, and others to ensure that state governments provide legislation, guidance, and incentives to prepare comprehensive plans and to achieve consistency between Hamilton County and local government plans and regulations, and between the Hamilton County and local government plans of neighboring communities.
 

Policy Opportunity:
24. Establishing strategies for minimizing the inefficiencies that arise from fragmented government authority and duplication of services can increase government efficiency and decrease local tax burden.

Implementation Policies:
24.1. Hamilton County and local governments should consolidate public facilities and services to achieve economies of scale where feasible, or establish equitable inter-Hamilton County and local government agreements to provide for more efficient delivery of public facilities and services.

24.2. Hamilton County and local governments should work together to maintain and enhance green infrastructure that crosses jurisdictional boundaries30.

24.3. Hamilton County and local governments should work together to ensure that the timing and location of proposed development and transportation projects in one community do not adversely affect neighboring communities.
 

Policy Opportunity:
25. Increased understanding of public costs associated with new development and use of a consistent method for calculating public costs associated with new development can lead to development decisions that generate needed revenues.

Implementation Policies:
25.1. Hamilton County and local governments should use a standardized model supplied by OKI for calculating the public costs associated with new development.

25.2. Hamilton County and local governments should foster creative public/private financing mechanisms and partnerships for public facility improvements.

25.3. Hamilton County and local government comprehensive plans should consider public costs and revenues from new development, as well as the need for accommodating low revenue land uses (such as parks and affordable housing).
 

Policy Opportunity:
26. An increase in population density and guidance of population movement toward communities at the current centers of population and employment (where public facilities and services, roadways and other infrastructure have been expanded or are planned for expansion as outlined in Hamilton County and local government comprehensive plans) can decrease the rate of land consumption and lower the cost of government services.

Implementation Policies:
26.1. Hamilton County and local governments should use their comprehensive plans and zoning ordinances to direct development with a residential density of two or more household units per acre to areas with sewers and other urban services or to areas where it can be phased with the provision of sewers and other urban services.

26.2. Hamilton County and local governments should prioritize infrastructure capital investments, including civic facilities, to serve existing and planned centers of population and employment, rather than developing greenfields

26.3. Hamilton County and local governments should encourage patterns and forms of development and redevelopment that maximize multi-modal transportation where appropriate, to reduce the total amount of daily vehicle miles traveled.

26.4. Hamilton County and local government zoning ordinances should permit mixed-use developments31 in centers of population and employment that are recommended in Hamilton County and local government comprehensive plans.

26.5. Hamilton County and local governments should give priority to transportation projects that facilitate infill and compact development, and foster transit-friendly32 developments.
 

Policy Opportunity:
27. Development of a regional database to identify abandoned and underutilized brownfield33 sites available for redevelopment will help to make brownfield redevelopment more economical and competitive with greenfield development.

Implementation Policies:
27.1 Hamilton County and local governments should work together to research and document existing legislation (Hamilton County and local government, state, federal) that hinders brownfield redevelopment. This research and documentation should also include an identification of opportunities for grants and other funding sources to help make brownfield redevelopment more economically feasible while protecting public health and safety.

27.2 All levels of government should work together to streamline brownfield redevelopment approval processes.

27.3 Hamilton County and local governments should identify and plan for commercial and industrial reuse of brownfield sites in their comprehensive plans.
 

Policy Opportunity:
28. Comprehensive plans, land development regulations, and related incentives can help to create cost-effective public facilities and services and a diverse mix of housing choices with higher-density developments, linkage of residential, work place, and shopping uses, and decreases in the per-unit cost of public facilities, taxes, and the level of income needed to obtain housing.

Implementation Policies:
28.1 Hamilton County and local government comprehensive plans should encourage compact, transit-friendly, pedestrian-oriented development and redevelopment, where appropriate, in an effort to minimize the per-unit cost of public facilities and services.

28.2 Hamilton County and local government comprehensive plans should encourage the use of innovative street design34 in conjunction with compact development to enhance or preserve community character, where such street design can be implemented safely and with balanced consideration of capacity needs for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians.

   

 

No foreign policy - no matter how ingenious - has any chance of success if it is born in the minds of a few and carried in the hearts of none.

HENRY KISSINGER
 

I never had a policy; I have just tried to do my very best each and every day.

ABRAHAM LINCOLN


Community COMPASS Participants

Awards

Glossary of Terms

Community COMPASS Process

Other Plans (local, countywide, state)

Alignment with OKI

Indicators

Smart Growth Principles

Hamilton County Treasures

Community COMPASS Publications


 

 

TOP

 
HAMILTON COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION / PLANNING PARTNERSHIP :: 2005